Government Incompetence In California Causes Wildfires To Run Rampant In Los Angeles

There are countless elected officials at the local, state, and federal level who are responsible with keeping Americans safe. And because they’ve been elected to do so, it shouldn’t be a far-fetched idea that they operate in this role with minimal issue. Sure, there will be tumultuous times while serving to protect one’s constituents, but there shouldn’t be a high level of incompetence shown either.

Unfortunately that’s all we see nowadays from those who we elect to serve us. Our politicians will far too often get caught up in bureaucratic red tape when putting together policies that would help the overall well-being of Americans. Not only that, but it seems as though some politicians these days aren’t all that interested in doing their job as they are in making a profit for themselves and their families.

That simply leads to a corrupt and inefficient government that doesn’t care about the people. And certainly no one likes an inefficient government. That truth is especially amplified when lives are at stake, like what’s happening with the Palisades wildfire in California. Countless homes have been burnt to the ground and some have lost their lives from the fires.

But now it’s coming out that these fires could have been handled much better if the Los Angeles area was properly prepared. There’s reports from the area that water isn’t available in the fire hydrants. Does this sound like a city that was prepared for one of the worst wildfires in their history? Gross incompetence is yet again proving to rear its ugly head among government officials and the people have had enough.

Poorly Run Government In LA Enhances Scope Of Wildfire Disaster

As Los Angeles firefighters confronted the most devastating blaze in the city’s history, an unthinkable problem arose: there wasn’t enough water. According to the Los Angeles Times one firefighter announced over the radio that “the hydrants are down.” Another voice followed: “Water supply just dropped.” In one of LA’s most affluent and picturesque neighborhoods, Pacific Palisades, fire crews were left powerless to stop entire blocks from being consumed. Flames swept through the area late Tuesday into early Wednesday, reducing homes and businesses to rubble in mere hours.

“There’s no water in the fire hydrants,” Rick Caruso, owner of the Palisades Village mall, told local reporters. “The firefighters are there, and there’s nothing they can do — we’ve got neighborhoods burning, homes burning, and businesses burning. … It should never happen.” The disaster highlighted years of mismanagement and systemic dysfunction in Los Angeles’ water infrastructure. A combination of operational blunders, high-profile corruption, and failed leadership left the city’s firefighting efforts hamstrung just when they were needed most.

Fanned by powerful Santa Ana winds, the Pacific Palisades fire leveled over 1,000 buildings and scorched 16,000 acres—an area larger than Manhattan. By Wednesday evening, not a single acre had been contained. As the flames spread, so did public outrage. Three simultaneous fires wreaked havoc across Los Angeles County, leaving five dead, causing injuries to others, and forcing 70,000 people to flee their homes. Many residents were furious, directing their anger at local and state leaders for allowing this preventable disaster to escalate.

To make matters worse, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass was overseas in Ghana when the fires erupted. She returned mid-crisis after facing backlash, particularly for approving an $18 million cut to the fire department last year. “RESIGN! WHY ARE YOU IN GHANA?!,” one exasperated commenter wrote on an X post from Bass’ office. One local spoke to Fox News, saying, “I’m born and raised in Los Angeles, I spend my life worrying about when the earthquakes come, when the Santa Ana winds come. I plan my trips around this. For someone to be in charge of my town … where were you?”

California Governor Gavin Newsom also found himself under fire. Critics blamed his administration for years of inadequate wildfire prevention measures. Decades of poor forestry management, lax enforcement of fire safety standards, and bureaucratic red tape had left the state dangerously exposed to recurring wildfire seasons. The Pacific Palisades blaze exposed the fragility of LA’s water infrastructure. According to Janisse Quiñones, head of the Department of Water and Power, and what he told the Los Angeles Times, firefighters’ water use was four times higher than normal during the first 15 hours of the fire. Despite having 114 massive storage tanks designed to maintain water pressure, three key reservoirs serving the Palisades ran dry within hours. Once those tanks were empty, hydrant pressure dropped to unusable levels.

Criticism of California’s leadership extended to President-elect Donald Trump, who blasted Governor Newsom for prioritizing environmental regulations over human safety. Trump has long accused Newsom of failing to manage the state’s water supply properly and neglecting critical forest management practices, such as clearing dead vegetation and performing controlled burns. “He wanted to protect an essentially worthless fish called a smelt… but didn’t care about the people of California,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, referring to Newsom’s opposition to redirecting water supplies from Northern California to the south.

While Newsom often touts his wildfire prevention efforts, a 2021 investigation conducted by CapRadio and NPR’s California Newsroom revealed that his administration had exaggerated progress on critical initiatives like fuel breaks and prescribed burns by over 690%. These failures have left California residents paying the price year after year.

But the dysfunction doesn’t stop at wildfire management—it permeates LA’s water utility system. Over the past decade, two of the department’s three general managers have resigned amid scandals. One was accused of mismanaging $40 million, while another, David Wright, was sentenced to six years in prison for accepting bribes. Mayor Bass herself faced scrutiny for removing Cynthia Ruiz, the department’s first Native American commissioner, after less than a year on the job. This occurred despite Bass bragging about using DEI (Diversity Equity and Inclusion) practices to hire people.

These systemic failures do more than exacerbate short-term crises; they create conditions for disasters to repeat and worsen. Experts have long warned that Los Angeles’ aging infrastructure, combined with political mismanagement, leaves the city woefully unprepared for emergencies like wildfires. Yet meaningful reforms remain elusive. The government’s inability to plan for the predictable—whether it’s wind-driven fires, drought, or the ever-present threat of earthquakes—prolongs suffering and compounds damage. Instead of proactively addressing vulnerabilities in water systems, leaders have often responded with finger-pointing and short-term fixes that fail to address root causes.

For residents, the message is clear: they’re on their own. Whether it’s fighting fires with shovels or fleeing without warning, Los Angeles citizens are left to bear the consequences of Democrat leadership that prioritizes political optics over preparedness. As future wildfires are inevitable, experts say California’s lack of foresight will only deepen the crisis. Without a serious overhaul of infrastructure, accountability, and emergency planning, these natural disasters will remain not only a recurring tragedy but an indictment of governance gone wrong.

How would you rate the job California’s government has done with managing these wildfires? Is this another example of incompetence being displayed by elected officials? Let us know in the comments down below!

13 COMMENTS

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Clifford M. Reid Jr.
Clifford M. Reid Jr.
8 days ago

The opening lines of your article are erroneous.
“There are countless elected officials at the local, state, and federal level who are responsible with keeping Americans safe. And because they’ve been elected to do so, it shouldn’t be a far-fetched idea that they operate in this role with minimal issue.” Government officials are not charged with protecting the American people outside of their Constitutional parameters. They are not elected to protect the people of the United States. They are elected to protect our natural, unalienable rights as directed by the Declaration: “…that to secure these rights, governments are instituted.” So please stop it!

doug meador
doug meador
8 days ago

To the contraire, They are employed, elected, to protect the people, staying within the limits of the Constitution while doing so. The Constitution is a guide to conduct. The “job” to which one is elected or employed is a defined purpose needed to benefit the well being of the People – as determined by the People.
Officials ARE elected to ‘protect’ the People in the job function to which they were elected staying within Condtitutional parameters while doing so. The effects of selecting, electing or employing incompetents unaware of their basic responsibilities are readily apparent in the present state of affairs within our country. An example; Solutions for the prevention of large fires are known. Notice ‘prevention’. Failure to steadfastly fund and apply those solutions is simply dereliction of duty.

Clifford M. Reid Jr.
Clifford M. Reid Jr.
7 days ago
Reply to  doug meador

No, Their job is to protect our rights. With all do respect, of course. If I call 911 for a burglar The sheriff or police will be too late to catch him or keep me alive. But with my 2nd Amendment rights, I can protect myself. The governments job is to prosecute those who violate our rights, thereby creating a determent. And it’s the feds job to secure our borders. But they are not. They want to protect us instead. But many laws created to supposedly protect the population are serious violations of our unalienable rights. the government that is strong enough to protect you will invariably be strong enough to take away your rights, also.

Clifford M. Reid Jr.
Clifford M. Reid Jr.
7 days ago
Reply to  doug meador

I think our discussion might be enhanced by understanding it’s a matter of semantics. Yes, if the elected officials protect our unalienable rights, of course, for the most part, we are protected, because we CAN protect ourselves. There are many things which government is required to do which protect us indirectly, i.e. our borders. But it’s the process which makes the difference. For instance: Dad teaches me to box and defend myself, but mom says “Don’t fight.” Now if I follow my dad’s training I won’t be bullied. But if I can’t use the training my dad gave me (let’s call that “Constitutional” training), it’s all for nothing because I will have to have mommy (or big brother, or government) with me all the time to protect me from bullies. That is a simple example. But it is a good one which shows the difference between confidently protecting yourself (the reason America has won ALL of it’s DECLARED wars), and having to BE protected. It shows a basic difference in mentality between the “self confident” personality, and the “victim” personality. Or, in other words, between winners and losers. The more we expect the government to give us, the more we expect the government to protect us, the fewer and fewer freedoms we will have.

Roseann Carpenter
Roseann Carpenter
7 days ago

Could I simply ask “who is in charge of your forestry in California. And do not the San Anna winds come often enough to make pols aware of the cause of the danger?Just asking not charging, but the leaders get paid by the citizens to take care of their interest, and keeping homes from fire is one of those expectations.

Clifford M. Reid Jr.
Clifford M. Reid Jr.
7 days ago

Having graduated in Stand and Whole Forest Management from Northern Arizona University School of Forestry, I feel somewhat qualified to answer this question. Who’s jurisdiction are the current fires burning in? Are the lands forested, or are they shrub and brush? And jurisdiction would also depend on whether it is county forest land, state forest land, or federal forest land, which is again divided into National Forest Service and National Park Service. Next, is the question as to what those charged with management are allowed to do according to environmental regulations. I don’t know the laws in California, but I’m sure environmental activists are prominent in California, which means that much that could be done to prevent first is not allowed to be done due to “endangered species” and logging moratoriums. I can tell you that in Arizona the dwarf mistletoe (extremely destructive to ponderosa pine) is running rampant in the forests due to environmental laws which have hogged tied the forest managers. I have no doubt that the same type of thing is happening in California.

Clifford M. Reid Jr.
Clifford M. Reid Jr.
7 days ago

On the other hand, these are fires within the City of L.A. which is probably not federal or state, and It’s the city firefighters which the article attacks, not necessarily state or federal officials. Or if it does refer to state and federal, the report is erroneous by blaming the wrong folks (which doesn’t seem so uncommon in the news these days). There are so many jurisdictions and agencies, anymore, it’s hard to keep track of them all! (And people wonder why the national debt is so high.)

Charles evering
Charles evering
8 days ago

Since we the people of the entire USA for 180 days of 100percent funding for California I personally would expect a FULL investigation of what happened and who is responsible.

Sally Martin
Sally Martin
8 days ago

Then what are they elected for. Although California residents can partially blame themselves. Several years ago, they had the opportunity to get rid of Newsom and what did they do? They voted him back in. The mayor of LA is another example of poor government management. You probably are an employee of LA that’s why you are taking their side!! They should fire that mayor and governor. BUT WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT FROM A DEMOCRATIC LED STATE??

Jim Delamater
Jim Delamater
7 days ago

Until we create accountability and fire people for poor performance, they will continue to fail the citizenry.

John F. Sullivan
John F. Sullivan
7 days ago

ZERO!

Roseann Carpenter
Roseann Carpenter
7 days ago

this neglect of the forest, that all have watched over the years is unforgiveable, also trying to implement ‘climate change or global warming’ is just the idiots way out of taking responsibility. I know that not all California,,voted for these loser and irresponsible politicians, IMO

12345
12345
4 days ago

Elected Officials, have proved their incompetence once and again, for All to see…..It is time to remove them from Office. Immediately if possible….

Featured Articles

Subscribe

Related Articles

13
0
Comment and let us know what the people thinkx
()
x