The Supreme Court could be in trouble thanks to this Democrat’s proposal

Rep. James Clyburn of South Carolina made plain his desire to pack the Supreme Court during an appearance on NBC’s Meet the Press.

The longtime Democrat declared that the high court needs thirteen justices. This comes at a moment when progressive voices keep pushing to alter the institution.

“Since we are on the topic of the court, let’s speak more broadly about it. Former Vice President Kamala Harris shares some of your criticisms clearly. She’s called for expanding the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13. Do you support adding four more seats to the Supreme Court,” Kristen Welker, the host, asked.

““Yes, I do. I think that we are in a position now that calls for some significant actions taken by the Congress and we ought to expand. Thirteen is a pretty good number. A baker’s dozen would be a good number to have on the court,” Clyburn stated in response.

“And I would hope we would get people on the court who will follow the constitutional underpinnings of this great nation of ours.”

That language frames court packing as some necessary correction rather than a raw power play.

Clyburn went further, tying his preference to historical shifts in how certain amendments have been read.

“The 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments have been interpreted in different ways over the years. And we had in the Warren Court an interpretation of those amendments that I thought would be set for the future of the country,” he stated.

“We have now a Supreme Court that decided to reverse course and take this country back.”

The complaint reveals the real motivation. Clyburn prefers the activist style of the Warren era and objects when today’s justices return to the text and original understanding of the Constitution.

In the eyes of right-leaning Americans who value limited government, that reversal is long overdue.

The current Court has pushed back against decades of judicial overreach that treated the Constitution as a blank check for progressive policy.

Clyburn’s baker’s dozen idea is not a serious constitutional reform.

When the Court rules in ways that frustrate the left’s agenda, the response is to change the number of seats rather than persuade the public or amend the Constitution through the proper process.

4 COMMENTS

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Lee Hauenstein
Lee Hauenstein
13 days ago

Since the Communists think that the Supreme Court needs to have more Justices, then the Republicans should just add 4 or six more Justices to the court and fill those seats while they hold the Majority. That should satisfy the Communist Party.

vn0a88
vn0a88
5 days ago

Finally found a platform that doesn’t lag during peak hours. The bonus offers are quite generous for new players. Check out vn0a88 if you want a fair game.

vnvipwin88
vnvipwin88
3 days ago

The game variety is insane! I spent hours exploring different rooms and everything works perfectly. Highly recommend vnvipwin88 for any serious player.

winph
winph
10 hours ago

The visual momentum described is key; it’s not just bright colors, it’s strategic placement. For seamless mobile action, checking out the winph app download apk seems smart. Great breakdown!

Featured Articles

Subscribe

Related Articles

4
0
Comment and let us know what the people thinkx
()
x